thou shalt not wear jeanshorts

| | Comments (12) | TrackBacks (0)

Battlestar Galactica characters as seen by a Matt Groening knockoff artist.

MetroWeekly has kindly provided a pictoral directory of who not to date in DC.

I suppose here in DC we have the swarms of gay Republicans to avoid and be annoyed by...but I pity those of you in NYC who must certainly be irritated by having to pass by any random David Blaine "stunt". They're both quite similar really - pointless, far too exposed, and a bit wrinkly.

And from the DC Urban Family Blog: the Dupont Cirlce 10 Commandments.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: thou shalt not wear jeanshorts.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.kr8tiv.com/blogit2/mt-tb.cgi/155

12 Comments

copperred said:

Re: MW's parade of undateables: In the published ones none have facial hair and online they have two non-gay facial hair guys. So not dateable without either that or hairiness. Clearly a sign if there ever was one.

Joe.My.God. said:

Some of those LCR's look shockingly normal. Pod people, I tells ya!

homer said:

So, do all the older guys date twink-a-bees in DC? And do all of the Log Cabin-ets tweeze and sculpt their eyebrows? And why aren't they whipping themselves and begging for forgiveness?

sam said:

But in New York we can avoid David Blaine...

Mark said:

Not a pretty bunch, those log cabin boys.

Jeffrey said:

Gee, they're all so... white. If there is any justice whatsoever, they will never get laid. Except in prison when they're convicted for some white-collar offense and end up being somebody's bitch.

(Sorry, it's clear I haven't had enough coffee today....)

Ugh!
The outfits!
Tuxedo jackets should NEVER be cut with notched lapels like a business suit(in spite of what the clerk at the rental shop says)
and should ONLY be accessorized with a bow tie. Striving faggots should know these things.

Zero snaps for these gurls.

boo Augustus said:

Maybe it's the lawyer in me, but I'd like to offer a clarification, caveat and/or amendment to "thou shalt not wear jeanshorts:"

a. said prohibition shall not apply to cutoff jeans worn as shorts, provided; however, that said cut-off jeans -
i. fall no lower than 2 and 3/4 inches above the knee,
ii. are not so short that wearer's manhood or parts thereof are falling outside the cut-off jeans unless said wearer is starring in a porn movie and/or is otherwise incredibly hot (although how he could be comfortable with his manhood or parts thereof squeezed through the opening of the cut-off jeans I'll never understand), and
iii. contain sufficient fringe at the cut opening so as not to appear as standard jean shorts and are prodcued from jeans having an aged or faded appeaance, and
b. futher provided that wearing said cut-off jeans shall not entitle wearer to,
i. adopt or otherwise mimic any Daisy Duke (epsecially as portayed by Jessica Simpson) effectations, or
ii. don 1970's era knee-high athletic socks with the color bars at the top.

jeremy said:

So everyone's talking about the LCRs. Ok, I'll add my two cents--something witty about and abundance of cleft chins and self-hatred.
Ok, now to the part of the post I loved--the BSG drawing. A-mazing.

Herb said:

They are a bunch of smug, yet bland people--except for the fabulous drag queens in the right top corner on Page 3.

Bufftuff said:

Do you ever wonder why in Metro Weekly, none of these guys names are ever printed under the photos? If they are so out there to celebrate, how come we never know their names? Just wondering. Big hairy muscle hugs. But do wear a jock.

Bufftuff said:

YEa, sometimes these guyz just want to get their mugs in something like Metro Weekly. But do we really care?

Leave a comment

E-mail jimbo

Blogroll